[🇧🇩-Airforce] MRCA Program of Bangladesh Air Force

[Bilal9]

What evidence do you have to back up your claims regarding the quality of J-10C aircraft?

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

 

[Jiangnan]

Your opinion doesn't count. Either good or bad. You guys are Xi's slave. You can think only to the extent Xi allows you to think.

Tejas Universe No.1. India Universe No.1. Respect India, Respect Modi. Please do not send the Shiva army to assassinate me.

 

[Jiangnan]

Krishna with Flute said:

It is an Air cooled mediocre radar with Low power. Had it been high power, it would have required greater cooling requirement. Example are car and byke engines. For greater cooling requirement in car, water cooling and radiators are requirement. J 10 being a mediocre fighter is evident from the data. Tejas MK2 with 56/98 KN Engine has a payload of 6.5 tones i.e 500 KG higher than Chinese J 10 which carries only 6000 k.g with 72/130 KN engine which is 35 to 40% powerful. It has higher take off time than even Tejas MK1A. It is not made low RCS. Atleast 19 had fallen down till 2021. It has high RCS and can be detected from a long distance. J10 A and B are total junk. J10 c is moderately good with addition of TVC and other stuff. Electronics was never a plus point of Chinese aircraft. It legs behind all nations making aircraft in AVIONICS. It has substandard weapons in terms of their WVR and BVER missiles with inferior seekers. They hype the range by citing highest range at high altitude which reduces to half at around 6000 to 8000 meter compared to 15000 meters.

Jiangnan,

Do you agree with Krishna with Flute about the quality of J-10?

I completely agree. We all know. Tejas is the world's most powerful fighter jet. 1 Tejas = 100 Rafale.

 

[Bilal9]

What evidence do you have to back up your claims regarding the quality of J-10C aircraft?

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

While comparing Tejas and JF 17, Global Times said the same thing. The last sentence of the article was " While JF 17 is a plane of present, Tejas is a plane of future".

How can it be a plane of the future being slightly better than MiG-29, Su-30 and Mirage 2000? It is antiquated as anything. The design and components are all over two decades old.

Too small and too old...

 

[Krishna with Flute]

প্রমান নাইক্কা, খামাখা চাপা মারে... নিজেরা পারেনা কিসু বানাইতে, শুধু চীন দেশের মালের বদনাম

How can it be a plane of the future being slightly better than MiG-29, Su-30 and Mirage 2000? It is antiquated as anything. The design and components are all over two decades old.

Too small and too old...

The words were used by Global times when the article was published when JF 17 was new. At that time (even today) Tejas had used lot more composite than any other aircraft and it was tweaked for low RCS design in the limitation of Aerodynamics. It had a very advance flight control system and lesser numbers of parts. It had a very good Israeli radar and multiple weapon options from India, Europe, Israel and Russia. It was very good when it came. It is good even today. That is why (Perhaps) Global Times had told it an aircraft of future. It was an aircraft of future at that time and that is why it is contemporary today. JF 17 was Contemporary at that time that is why out dated today.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

@Krishna with Flute

He has no access to open media. He knows only to the extent which Xi allows him to know. Do not take him seriously. If he tries to act like others, he will disappear like many other Chinese.

 

[Saif]

The words were used by Global times when the article was published when JF 17 was new. At that time (even today) Tejas had used lot more composite than any other aircraft and it was tweaked for low RCS design in the limitation of Aerodynamics. It had a very advance flight control system and lesser numbers of parts. It had a very good Israeli radar and multiple weapon options from India, Europe, Israel and Russia. It was very good when it came. It is good even today. That is why (Perhaps) Global Times had told it an aircraft of future. It was an aircraft of future at that time and that is why it is contemporary today. JF 17 was Contemporary at that time that is why out dated today.

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

My friend,

I have explained that in my early posts. It was said when JF 17 had arrived and both planes were compared. It is not something which someone has said today.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

The design of Tejas is very old. How can it be an aircraft of the future?

And design of Tejas is not very old. It is contemporary delta wing design with RSS unstable platform. It is based on same philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen. Infact, JF 17 is outdated design with lavcon like F16 and Mig 29. J10 is even worse than that based on rejeted design of Lavi fighter. It has poor aerodynamics and that is why it has gone through noticable design Changes in A, B and C variant. Just look at the air intakes of A, B and C variant.

 

[Saif]

And design of Tejas is not very old. It is contemporary delta wing design with RSS unstable platform. It is based on same philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen. Infact, JF 17 is outdated design with lavcon like F16 and Mig 29. J10 is even worse than that based on rejeted design of Lavi fighter. It has poor aerodynamics and that is why it has gone through noticable design Changes in A, B and C variant. Just look at the air intakes of A, B and C variant.

The design of Tejas is 40 years old. It was first conceived in the 80s. So, your claim of Tejas being based on the same design philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen is not true.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The design of Tejas is 40 years old. It was first conceived in the 80s. So, your claim of Tejas being based on the same design philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen is not true.

The design of Tejas is 40 years old. It was first conceived in the 80s. So, your claim of Tejas being based on the same design philosophy of Eurofighter, Rafale and Saab gripen is not true.

No it is very much true because the planes which I cited were conceived in same time frame. i.e in conceptualized in 80s, flew in nineties and operationalized in first decade of 2000. Tejas conceived few years later. Development begun in nineties , flew in 2001 and inducted in next decade. It took a decade more because of lack of ecosystem.

 

[Jiangnan]

Why is Tejas the world's most powerful fighter jet? Although Tejas hasn't flown for 2 years. It is known as the king of hangars.

You should know. No country has the courage to park its main fighter jets in a warehouse for 2 years. But India can.

US aerospace giant delivers first of Tejas Mk1A engines, ends 2-year delay

The delay has affected the deliveries of 83 Tejas Mk1A fighter jets, a fact lamented by Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on several occasions.

www.indiatoday.in

Tejas integrates all the world's most advanced technologies.

Its engine comes from the US.
Its ejection seat comes from the UK.
Its radar and avionics come from Israel.
Its air-to-air missiles come from Israel.
oh It was designed by Dassault.

oh This is the future fighter jet.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

Why is Tejas the world's most powerful fighter jet? Although Tejas hasn't flown for 2 years. It is known as the king of hangars.

You should know. No country has the courage to park its main fighter jets in a warehouse for 2 years. But India can.

US aerospace giant delivers first of Tejas Mk1A engines, ends 2-year delay

The delay has affected the deliveries of 83 Tejas Mk1A fighter jets, a fact lamented by Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh on several occasions.

www.indiatoday.in

Tejas integrates all the world's most advanced technologies.

Its engine comes from the US.
Its ejection seat comes from the UK.
Its radar and avionics come from Israel.
Its air-to-air missiles come from Israel.
oh It was designed by Dassault.

oh This is the future fighter jet.

When you live in China, you get many information's such as Tejas has not flown for 2 years. Exclusive Privilege of living in Xi's land.

 

[Jiangnan]

When you live in China, you get many information's such as Tejas has not flown for 2 years. Exclusive Privilege of living in Xi's land.

believe me. in China. People usually declare India as the No.1 in the universe.

Look. tejas, Universe No.1!

光辉战机，宇宙第一!

You must admit it. Tejas Universe No.1!

 

[Jiangnan]

Indian friends believe that we cannot praise India in China. But this is a mistake. in China. As long as we discuss India. We must acknowledge that India is the NO.1 in the universe. Praise India every day.

look.

印度，光辉战机。宇宙最强战斗机。
India. tejas. The most powerful fighter jet in the universe.

Praise India. Praise Tejas.

 

[Saif]

Indian friends believe that we cannot praise India in China. But this is a mistake. in China. As long as we discuss India. We must acknowledge that India is the NO.1 in the universe. Praise India every day.

look.

印度，光辉战机。宇宙最强战斗机。
India. tejas. The most powerful fighter jet in the universe.

View attachment 16169

Praise India. Praise Tejas.

Can't read Chinese, Jiangnan

 

[Jiangnan]

Can't read Chinese, Jiangnan

I have already translated Chinese. You can try extracting the text from the image and translating it.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

believe me. in China. People usually declare India as the No.1 in the universe.

Look. tejas, Universe No.1!

光辉战机，宇宙第一!
View attachment 16167

You must admit it. Tejas Universe No.1!

When Xi's voices cannot argue on point, they use this sort of Gimmick to distract arguments.

 

[Jiangnan]

When Xi's voices cannot argue on point, they use this sort of Gimmick to distract arguments.

Respect Indian propaganda. Indian Universe No.1. India dominates the Milky Way. Modi leads the solar system. Love India, love Modi. From China.

 

[Bilal9]

The words were used by Global times when the article was published when JF 17 was new. At that time (even today) Tejas had used lot more composite than any other aircraft and it was tweaked for low RCS design in the limitation of Aerodynamics. It had a very advance flight control system and lesser numbers of parts. It had a very good Israeli radar and multiple weapon options from India, Europe, Israel and Russia. It was very good when it came. It is good even today. That is why (Perhaps) Global Times had told it an aircraft of future. It was an aircraft of future at that time and that is why it is contemporary today. JF 17 was Contemporary at that time that is why out dated today.

Fine, keep bad mouthing JF-17.

We will see proof in the pudding at the next conflict.

We sincerely hope that Tejas does not get to tussle with J-10, J-11, J-15 or J-16 because it will be unequal fight. If it meets J-20 or J-35 then game over. If it meets Chinese 6th Gen fighters, game will be over even before anything begins.