War Archive 2024+ Iran VS Israel

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G War Archive
War Archive 2024+ Iran VS Israel
3K
97K
More threads by Saif

Status
Not open for further replies.
They can’t go to Ukraine half the Israelis are colored people. The Ukrainian are known nazi collaborators.

The Germans never killed these Jews. They always used the Baltic and Ukrainian Nazi converts to carry out the holocaust.

Isn't Zelensky a Jew?
 

Iran moves to triple military budget amid Israel tensions
Agence France-Presse . Tehran 29 October, 2024, 22:46

1730251556217.png

AFP file photo

Iran’s government has proposed tripling its military spending, an official said Tuesday, as tensions with arch-rival Israel rise following recent tit-for-tat missile strikes.

Government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani outlined the move that would see ‘a significant increase of more than 200 per cent in the country’s military budget’ at a news conference in Tehran, without elaborating.

Tehran has not disclosed any exact figures, but according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute think tank, Iran’s military spending in 2023 was about $10.3 billion.

The proposed budget will be debated, with lawmakers expected to finalise it in March.

‘All efforts have been made to meet the country’s defence needs and special attention has been paid to this issue,’ said Mohajerani.

The plan came days after Israel carried out air strikes on military sites in Iran in response to Tehran’s October 1 attack, itself retaliation for the killing of Iran-backed militant leaders and a Revolutionary Guards commander.

At least four soldiers were killed in the Israeli strikes, according to Iran’s military, and Iranian media reported Monday that a civilian was also killed in the attack.

Afterwards, Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant said his country’s strikes had shifted the balance of power between the sworn enemies.

‘The enemy has been weakened — both in its ability to produce missiles and in its ability to defend itself. This changes the balance of power,’ Gallant said in a statement.

Iran’s attack on October 1, when it said it fired 200 projectiles at Israel, was its second-ever direct attack on its arch-enemy.

Israel said most of the missiles were intercepted but one person was killed.

The Islamic republic conducted its first direct attack on Israel in mid-April, in response to a suspected Israeli strike on Iran’s consulate in the Syrian capital Damascus that killed seven Revolutionary Guards, including two generals.

The tit-for-tat moves unfold amid Israel’s on-going war with Hamas, which has expanded in recent weeks to include Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

The Gaza war broke out in October 2023 following the Palestinian Hamas militant group’s unprecedented attack on Israel.

On Monday, Iran and Israel accused each other of endangering Middle East peace in a heated exchange at a UN meeting.

SIPRI says Israel’s military spending grew by 24 per cent, reaching $27.5 billion in 2023 alone, coming second in the region after Saudi Arabia.

Current figures on Israel’s 2024 military spending are unavailable, though the country has benefited from substantial military aid provided by the United States since the outbreak of the war.

Israel has for the decades been the largest recipient of US assistance.

According to Iran’s official IRNA news agency, the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps receive the highest portion of the country’s military budget.

The regular army and other branches of the armed forces receive a smaller allocation, the agency said based on figures of the current fiscal year which ends in March 2025.

Iran does not recognise Israel, and the two countries have fought a shadow war for years.

The Islamic republic accuses Israel of having carried out a wave of sabotage attacks and assassinations targeting its nuclear programme.​
 

Israeli strikes hurt Iran, further escalation possible: analysts
Agence France-Presse . Paris 02 November, 2024, 01:06

While heeding US calls to steer clear of nuclear or oil infrastructure, Israel in its strikes on Iran inflicted severe damage on Iranian air defences and missile capacities and could yet launch more wide-scale action against the Islamic republic, analysts say.

Following Iran’s October 1 salvo of missiles against Israel last month — intended as a reprisal to Israeli strikes that killed senior figures in Iran-backed groups Hezbollah and Hamas — there were fears Israel would respond with attacks on Iran of a magnitude that could spark a global conflict.

The United States, mindful of the risk of the conflict spreading, swiftly pressured its ally to avoid the most escalatory options of strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure or oil and gas production facilities.

In the end, according to media reports and analysts, Israel opted for strikes on October 26 against Iranian air defence systems including several guarding oil refineries, as well as three key missile production facilities.

While Iranian officials have in public minimised the importance of the strikes, which killed four servicemen, it is now becoming clear the attacks inflicted significant damage as well as containing an implicit warning from Israel that more could be in store.

‘Israel’s target set clearly suggests it intended to erode Iran’s critical missile production capacity and facilitate further military action if the conflict escalates,’ said an analysis from the Washington-based Hudson Institute.

It said Israel used around 100 combat aircraft and possibly drones in its attack, targeting Iranian ‘missile manufacturing capabilities and strategic air defence architecture’.

‘Israel likely handicapped Iran’s ability to produce the high-end, solid-fuel, medium-range ballistic missiles that Tehran used in its October 1 salvos,’ it added.

The action against missile production is all the more pertinent at a time when Iran is accused by the West of supplying Russia with attack drones and missiles for its war against Ukraine.

Fabian Hinz, research fellow at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies said Israel had hit three Iranian facilities in Shahroud, Parchin and Khojir that make the solid propellant for missiles.

‘There are indications that they very deliberately targeted bottlenecks within the production process that would have pretty large implications for Iran’s missile production,’ he said.

‘These strikes might not have produced the most spectacular videos, they were designed very smartly to produce substantial effect even with a limited number of targets. They privileged the effect over the spectacle.’

Satellite pictures provided by Planet Labs of the Parchin facility showed the apparent effects of the strike in an October 27 image, contrasted with the undamaged facility on September 9.

The targeting of air defences was also hugely significant, Hinz added.

‘They are sending the message that if Israel wants to strike again, that would be easier and could be more comprehensive next time.’

The Israeli strikes appear to have damaged Russian S-300 air defence systems delivered to Iran by Moscow, according to the US-based Institute for the Study of War which said Russia’s need for such systems in the war against Ukraine would constrain its ability to supply Iran.

Indeed, information from Israel on the strikes even suggests that ‘Iran does not have any functional S-300 batteries right now’, the ISW said.

Iranian defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Israel ‘tried to damage both our defensive and offensive systems’, but insisted ‘there has been no interruption in the process of producing offensive systems such as missiles’.

But the most dangerous standoff between the two foes is far from over, with both sides warning it could escalate further.

Mohammad Mohammadi Golpayegani, a senior aide to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and hugely influential official who speaks rarely in public, on Thursday warned of a ‘harsh and regretful’ response by Iran.

The New York Times on Friday cited three Iranian officials as saying Khamenei had instructed the Supreme National Security Council on Monday to prepare for a further strike on Israel as the ‘scope of Israel’s attack was too large to ignore’.

Israel could then retaliate again, with all eyes on whether it could decide to strike a nuclear site, although doubts remain over whether it could carry out such a bunker-busting attack without US assistance.

Israel’s military chief Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi warned Israel would hit back ‘very very hard’ if Iran retaliates against Israel.

Hinz said Israel’s strategy towards Iran had changed in the wake of the October 7, 2023 attacks against Israel by Iran-backed Hamas, and the Israeli leadership under prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was in no mood to back down against the Islamic republic.

‘If the Iranians launch another strike, then Israel might basically respond to that with another strike of their own. If they don’t do that, they might see it as even a stronger invitation to follow-on strikes,’ he said.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Posts you haven't read yet..

Members Online

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Back