Most of the top leaders of the BNP Standing Committee consider the talk of boycotting Indian products to be an expression of social media agitation and common people's anger. The leaders of the party feel that the common people are angry with India's behavior for various reasons. Out of that anger they have called for a boycott of Indian products.
But it is not an organized movement. Rather, it is a social movement. It will not be right for BNP to be in state power again and again and in the future as a power-seeking party to be associated with this movement.
Some of the top leaders of the party expressed this attitude when the discussion started on whether it would be right to join the party on the call of boycott of Indian products or not. A leader of BNP present in the meeting said that the debt was discussed for a short time. But no decision was made. In yesterday's meeting, the main discussion was about whether BNP should participate in the upazila elections or not.
This leader said that the final decision in this regard will be informed to the leaders and workers of the party in the next meeting.
A source present at the meeting said that the discussion on the boycott of Indian products mainly started with an action by the party's senior joint general secretary Ruhul Kabir Rizvi Ahmed. In the meeting, a leader asked if Rizvi's announcement of boycotting Indian products was a party decision. And if the decision is made, where did it happen? However, the acting chairman of the party said in the meeting that this is personal. Not a party decision.
The three leaders then spoke about why BNP as a party should not join such a movement. They said BNP has been in power many times. The party state will come to power in the future as well. There can be no reason for partisan entanglement with common people's anger against India. Because if the BNP comes to power in the future, how will the relationship with the neighboring country be determined!
Read the full article from source..... .
But it is not an organized movement. Rather, it is a social movement. It will not be right for BNP to be in state power again and again and in the future as a power-seeking party to be associated with this movement.
Some of the top leaders of the party expressed this attitude when the discussion started on whether it would be right to join the party on the call of boycott of Indian products or not. A leader of BNP present in the meeting said that the debt was discussed for a short time. But no decision was made. In yesterday's meeting, the main discussion was about whether BNP should participate in the upazila elections or not.
This leader said that the final decision in this regard will be informed to the leaders and workers of the party in the next meeting.
A source present at the meeting said that the discussion on the boycott of Indian products mainly started with an action by the party's senior joint general secretary Ruhul Kabir Rizvi Ahmed. In the meeting, a leader asked if Rizvi's announcement of boycotting Indian products was a party decision. And if the decision is made, where did it happen? However, the acting chairman of the party said in the meeting that this is personal. Not a party decision.
The three leaders then spoke about why BNP as a party should not join such a movement. They said BNP has been in power many times. The party state will come to power in the future as well. There can be no reason for partisan entanglement with common people's anger against India. Because if the BNP comes to power in the future, how will the relationship with the neighboring country be determined!
Read the full article from source..... .