[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
469
14K
More threads by Saif


Govt trying to solve power cuts within 2-3 weeks: Rizwana

1726187211596.png

File photo

The interim government is trying to solve the power outage problem within the next two-three weeks, Adviser for Environment and also Water Resources Syeda Rizwana Hasan said yesterday.

She said the load-shedding issue was discussed in the advisory council meeting held with Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus in the chair at his office.

"We'll try to reach a solution to this problem within two-three weeks," Rizwana said while replying to a question at a press briefing at the Foreign Service Academy after the meeting.

Election to be held after necessary reforms

The environment adviser said there were two main aspirations behind the mass uprising -- one, to end rampant discrimination, and the other, much-needed reforms.

Referring to the formation of six commissions to reform six key sectors, Rizwana said, "We initially expect that the commissions would place their reports within three months."

She said the implementation of the recommendations to be placed by the six commissions would depend on whether the government can build a political consensus on these. "We'll go for dialogue at one stage."

"We're thinking about elections after taking specific commitments on reforms or bringing specific amendments in some cases by reaching a political consensus through dialogues," she said.

Rizwana said the political parties have already made it clear that they would go for election after reforms.​
 

Reformation to power, energy sector: BWGED places 16-point proposals
BWGED places 16-point proposal for power sector reform

1726187377770.png


Bangladesh Working Group on Ecology and Development today proposed 16-point proposals for reforming the power and energy sector to ensure good governance, transparency and sustainable development to the sector.

The organisation made the proposals at a press conference at Dhaka Reporters' Unity.

The working group urged the interim government to adopt "No Coal or Coal Moratorium Policy", cancel any new coal-based plant from the power sector masterplan, move away from dependency on liquefied natural gas, and cancel the earlier-announced third LNG terminal.

They also asked the government to backtrack from the previous government's plan to introduce Japanese technologies including carbon capture and ammonia co-firing, which they termed as "unproven and false technologies".

BWGED also demanded removing 26-56 percent taxes in the renewable energy sector, revoking the Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) Act 2010, initiating a public investigation committee, making Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Impact Assessment mandatory for all projects, and initiating new masterplan aiming Net Zero carbon emission.

BWGED member secretary Hasan Mehedi said despite the country's commitment to reduce dependence on fossil fuel for power generation, it did not happen.

"Gas-based power plants generate electricity for half of a year and remain ineffective for rest of the time. As such, the previous government had been increasing LNG-based power plants," he added.

Addressing the event, Khondaker Golam Moazzem, research director at the Centre for Policy Dialogue, said it is high time to prioritise knowledge-based policy decisions and break the syndicate that has long been dominating the power and energy sector.

Mentioning that the previous government took decisions to favour certain individuals or groups, he said, "Now, decisions regarding formulation of laws and policies have to be taken in the light of people's welfare and science-based knowledge."

Moazzem also called for ensuring independence of the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission and Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority, and awarding all new plants through a competitive bidding process.

He further demanded the concerned ministry to disclose the Power Purchase Agreements to ensure transparency and accountability, and urged the interim government to prioritise civil society organisations' voices from local to national levels​
 

PDB says Adani dues inflated by 32pc
Emran Hossain 12 September, 2024, 23:11

1726190644139.png


The Bangladesh Power Development Board estimated that it owed to the Indian Adani Power $547 million, about 32 per cent less than what was claimed by the company, a sister concern of the controversial Indian Adani Group conglomerate.

The group’s chairman Gautam Adani sent a letter to chief adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh Muhammad Yunus last month seeking his intervention to clear his outstanding power bill of $800 million, Indian media reported on September 10.

The PDB confirmed that Adani Group asked for payment of $800 million in dues.

Officials at the power development board’s finance division explained that an unequal power purchase agreement that brought Adani into the country’s power scene last year in a deal patronised by Sheikh Hasina and Narendra Modi allowed price manipulation and the overpricing.

Power, energy and mineral resources adviser Muhammad Fouzul Kabir Khan said that a special committee was engaged in evaluating power and energy deals, including the one with Adani, signed during the tenure of the now overthrown Awami League government.

‘We are also writing a reply to the letter sent to the chief adviser explaining our position on the matter,’ he said sharing his knowledge regarding the difference in the estimates of its dues payable to Adani.

The power purchase agreement, better known as PPA, allowed Adani Power to generate electricity in its 1,600MW Godda power plant by burning coal carrying a calorific value of 4,600 kcal/kg, but charge Bangladesh for the use of coal carrying the calorific value of 6,322 kcal/kg.

It means, Bangladesh is being charged by Adani for a high quality coal use, while in reality the plant is using a lesser quality coal.

The price of coal varies greatly depending on its quality, explained officials at the PDB’s finance division, citing different prices of coal on the Indonesian index on Wednesday.

The price of a tonne of coal on the Indonesian index drops down to $51.18 from $127.72 between the categories of the coal producing 4200 kcal/kg and 6500 kcal/kg. The lowest quality of coal on the Indonesian index costs $31.78.

The PPA also allowed Adani to combine prices of coal on the Indonesian and Australian indexes and average them to claim a price from Bangladesh.

The Australian coal is of very high quality and more expensive than the Indonesian coal. Adani is allowed to use the high price to inflate its profit though importing coal from Indonesia entirely.

The provision of averaging the combined prices is rather unique since other similar power plants were never allowed such privileges. Power plants, such as Rampal and Payra, were allowed to use only one index for pricing.

The Adani power plant initially raised eyebrows as it had planned to use coal from an Australian mine owned by the Adani Group. The international media reported that Adani was allowed to dump its coal on Bangladesh as the fossil fuel was rapidly losing its market. Adani had to abandon the plan following widespread criticism.

The PPA, termed unequal by energy experts, allowed Adani to charge 60 per cent higher prices than the actual market price early last year, causing widespread outrage in Bangladesh.

In February, Adani demanded about $400 for each tonne of coal for running its Godda power plant in Jharkhand though the same coal was available for $250.

After the uproar over the coal price amidst a severe dollar crisis plaguing the past Awami League government, Adani agreed in what PDB calls a side letter that the company would charge price for coal keeping up with other coal-based power plants.

The PPA however remained unchanged.

The PPA, which was never made public, also lacked discount provision provided by the 1200MW Payra power plant in case of a sudden increase in the price of energy. The Payra plant gives up to 40 per cent discount.

Globally, PPAs offer the discount benefit, up to 55 per cent, for large-quantity coal purchases, energy experts said.

The effectiveness of the side letter expired in June this year, the PDB said.

Letters sent to Adani requesting an extension of the side letter after the autocratic Hasina government fell in early August was not replied.

PDB officials said that Adani rather insisted that their dues to be paid based on the PPA conditions.

Bangladesh is currently receiving a $4.7 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund based on agreeing to implement at least four dozen conditions.

In April, 2018, in a report the US-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis said that the Godda project would be one of the most expensive sources of electricity for Bangladesh.

The report pointed out that Bangladesh’s Godda electricity deal was clearly designed to benefit Adani.

In December 13, 2022, the institute in another report said that Bangladesh could not afford electricity produced by Adani without frequently increasing power tariff.

Ever since Adani rolled into operation last year, power price was increased several times.

The Washington Post showed the Godda project as the centrepiece of a report published in December 2022 for demonstrating how political influence and abuses enabled the Adani Group to build its coal empire in India and beyond.

‘The coal will probably come on Adani ships to an Adani-owned port in eastern India, then arrive at the plant on a stretch of Adani-built rail. The electricity generated will be sent to the border over an Adani-built high-voltage line. Under the contract, shipping and transmission costs will be passed on to Bangladesh,’ read a paragraph of the Washington Post report.

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis estimated that the coal shipping would involve an 8,000-km sea and a 700-km railway journeys.

Adani also built over 100-km power transmission lines and is entitled to charge Tk 0.29 per unit with a yearly increase rate of 1 per cent, according to a report published in June by the Bangladesh Working Group on External Debt.

The working group report estimated that Adani would have its investment returned in maximum six years while the capacity charge stipulated in the deal with Bangladesh would earn Adani over its 25-year lifetime some $12 billion.

Adani’s Godda investment was estimated to be $2 billion.

The power cell director Muhammad Hossain last year blamed lack of experience for the shortcomings in the deal with Adani.

Bangladesh’s current installed capacity is 27,791MW, but the country is struggling to generate even 13,000MW.

A crippling energy crisis is sweeping through the country amidst humid, hot days, prompting up to 20 hours of power cuts in many places.

Adani-appointed public relation agency in Bangladesh in reply to a request for comment said that what the BPDB said was correct as overdue amount. Amount remained not paid within two months due date.

It also said that Adani had not officially told any news media about any amount outstanding.​
 

Govt must move back on Adani power agreement
14 September, 2024, 00:00

THE agreement with India’s Adani Power by way of which it supplies Bangladesh with power from a 1.6GW Godda plant built in the Indian state of Jharkhand exclusively for the purpose has aired fresh fears as the Power Development Board has estimated that it owes Adani $547 million, about 32 per cent less than what the Indian entity has claimed. The Adani Group that owns Adani Power, as Indian media reported on September 10 which Bangladesh authorities have also confirmed, has written to the chief adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh in August seeking an intervention in the clearance of $800 in outstanding power bill. The power board says that the agreement, which brought Adani to Bangladesh’s power scene in 2023 under the patronisation of the deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, allows price manipulation and overpricing. Whilst the power board is reported to be writing to the chief adviser to the interim government on Bangladesh’s position on the agreement, the adviser on power, energy and mineral resources says that a special committee was evaluating all power and energy agreements, including the one with Adani, that were signed during the 15 years’ tenure of the Awami League government, overthrown on August 5 amidst a student-mass uprising.

The agreement has allowed Adani to generate power from coal carrying a calorific value of 4,600 kcal/kg but charge Bangladesh for the use of coal carrying 6,322 kcal/kg in calorific value. This comes down to the use of low-value coal for the payment of high-value coal. Besides, the agreement has allowed Adani to charge Bangladesh an average of coal prices on the Indonesian Index, in which a tonne of coal in the range of 4,200 kcal/kg–6,500 kcal/kg costs in the range of $51.18–$127.72, and the Australian Index, which is of very high quality and is more expensive, to inflate its profit although Adani sources its coal for the plant entirely from Indonesia. The provision for averaging the combined prices of coal is unique to the Godda project as no other similar plants have been given such privilege. The agreement, thus, allowed Adani to charge Bangladesh 60 per cent higher than the actual market price in 2023. Adani in February demanded about $400 for a tonne of coal although it was available for $250. The agreement also has no provision for discount, which is up to 55 per cent globally, in the case of a sudden increase in coal price as is the case with the 1.2GW Payra plant. Adani, which has invested an estimated $2 billion in the Godda plant, is reported to be getting its investment returns in six years and the capacity charge in the deal would earn Adani some $12 billion more in its 25-year lifetime.

Bangladesh’s installed power generation capacity is about 2.78GW, but it struggles to generate even 1.3GW, with a burdening overcapacity and consequent capacity charge payment. The interim government must, therefore, move back on the Adani power purchase agreement and, rather, improve on the use of generation capacity after a thorough review of the power and energy situation.​
 

Ensuring urgent fuel supply to power plants
Published :
Sep 13, 2024 21:56
Updated :
Sep 13, 2024 21:56

1726273718108.png


Severe load-shedding in the northern and northeastern districts including also Dhaka over the past few days has been causing enormous public suffering. The problems causing the disruptions in smooth power supply are, however, inherited from the immediate past government. The shutting down of all the operational units of Dinajpur's 525-MW coal-fired power plant, most of the country's gas-fired power plants which share more than 40 per cent of country's total generation capacity remaining out of production due to gas shortage and the huge arrears of unpaid power bills owed to a major power supplier from India, the Adani Group, are some of the issues debilitating the interim government's capacity to resolve the power shortage issue within a short time.

According to the Power Development Board (PDB), its total unpaid bills amount to Tk 350 billion. Even so, the adviser to the ministry of power, energy and mineral resources is learnt to have informed the media on September 11 last that the power situation would improve within three weeks. The steps to be taken for urgent addressing of the issues, he further informed, include urgent fixing of the technical glitches at the Barapukuria thermal power plant, the communication made with the Adani Group to enhance power supply and arrangements made to import LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas). The interim government's sincerity and urgency to respond to the emerging issues will make a difference. Any short-term answer to the problems involving production, supply and distribution of power should be part of a long-term strategy to rid the sector of its deeply ingrained ills. The long-term approach, as often stressed by well-meaning people and experts, should be to exploit the country's own potential reserves of gas and other fossil fuels.

The present problem of the power sector arises out of a lack of fuels to run power plants and the shortage of foreign currency to import those. But these problems could be avoided if the country's power sector was not fully made dependent on fuel import that eats up the lion's share of the hard currency that the country earns from remittances and exports. The main beneficiaries of this policy adopted by the past government have been the private power companies, contractors enjoying the government's patronage, the corrupt bureaucrats and ministers. Sadly, the nation's forex reserve was thus depleted to import LNG, coal and oils to feed the power plants that have the capacity to produce about double the power the country needs at the moment. But those remain idle for a lack of fuel. Now the nation is being forced to bear this unnecessary burden.

Under the circumstances, it would be incumbent upon the interim government to meet the emergencies through holding negotiations with major sources of fuels including the gulf countries, Indonesia and elsewhere so that fuel supplies to the power plants remain uninterrupted. At this point, the steps taken, as told by the energy adviser, to scrap the indemnity act "Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provision) Act in 2010" to protect the government from any judicial proceedings drawn against it, cancellation of the ministry's authority to fix energy tariffs, holding open bids for contractors and so on should be implemented as soon as possible.​
 

Members Online

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Back